What struck me from this tour was the lack of records that were kept. It seemed as if every question asked led to the response of inadequate or nonexistent documentation. In the Basílica de San Francisco, we saw carvings in the stones, a mark of its craftsmen. Here, nothing exists to immortalize its workers. Instead, documentation exists for the mules that helped power the machines.
This is the fact about which I was
aghast and curious. How did there exist plenty of documentation on the mules that
worked the mines, but little trace of the workers who toiled there? The mules’
work was exhausted in about two hours, but the workers at the mint worked much longer.
These people who mined enough silver to allegedly build a bridge from Potosí to
Madrid. And whose dead bodies provided
enough bones to build another bridge back. What reasoning did the Spanish have
for not logging information about their workers? A difficult undertaking given
the time that has now passed since these events, but what methods might we use
to try to discover more about these people? How were the bodies handled of the numerous
workers who died? What can we learn from such a lack of evidence so long ago in
history, and how can we get creative in order to do so?
Powerful observations. I was also struck by the fact that the guide said there was documentation about the mules, but not the workers. So tragic. How can history be understood (or how can de do historical research) without such records? How to overcome those challenges?
ReplyDelete