Traveling through the Campo was a
sobering experience for me. Even as a lifelong resident of Mississippi, I can’t
claim to have ever seen such impoverished and isolated communities in my whole
life. Just like many small towns in the American plains, these communities have
dried up like their water sources, and now see their ways of life, practiced as
long as the residents can remember, existentially threatened. As the residents
informed us, they feel abandoned by the Morales government, which claimed initially
to be the first administration dedicated to the needs of indigenous and rural
Bolivians. Many have already fled these dying communities to go to La Paz or El
Alto, often finding even more challenging conditions then those they left.
Those that have remained behind often have to depend on urban family members
sending back remittances that can scarcely be afforded. It is hard to imagine
that any but the most stubborn campesinos
see their lifestyles persisting more than another decade at most. Even with the
improvement projects of groups like the Suyana Foundation, unless the climate
or infrastructure surrounding these destitute communities somehow changes,
their president predicament is untenable. However, one’s vision of oneself and
one’s identity are very strongly associated with the way of life that one
inhabits. Many of these residents likely feel as though they would lose
something integral to themselves if they gave up the sheltering sky under which
they have labored since their youth in exchange for a tiny, huddled apartment
in a sprawling and unfamiliar city. Additionally, a fair handful cannot speak
Spanish confidently, having been raised in a closed community of Aymara
speakers. With all these odds against them, somehow, these communities still
persist. Some family members still return to aid in the harvest. Plans are made
to draw tourists and restore local churches in hopes of drawing some extra
income. Petitions are made for the government to construct improved highways to
their towns. Some of these hopes show promise, but others are pipe dreams. In
the long run, this question must eventually be asked by researchers and the campesinos themselves: are they willing
to move away from their homes and give up their previous way of life if no
solutions are found, or would they prefer to fight the elements and passage of
time to the bitter end, whatever that may be?
There's an interesting phrase by Barrington Moore (a sociologist of the 1950s) who suggested that modernization requires the "liquidation of the peasantry" as a social class. He didn't mean death camps (which was the way Stalin pursued this in the USSR) necessarily, but rather that the mass of rural people would inevitably be driven into cities. Look at the US. The rural population is very small (less than about 1-2% of the workforce are "farmers," compared to the high rate in the 1770s). Most of the rural south was depopulated in the 1920s-1930s (displaced to factories in Chicago, Detroit, Pittsburg, etc.). That process is now rapidly under way in Bolivia.
ReplyDelete