We visited the La Paz department of the UNDP, the United
Nations Development Programme, yesterday. It was one of the most intriguing
experiences I have had yet, as we were able to candidly discuss and learn about
development in Bolivia. I expected to leave a little smarter, but as I should
be acclimated to by now, I left with my head spinning:
What is development? How do we measure it? And in the case
of the UNDP, how do we know when our development work is completed?
Something that struck me during our visit was when we
started discussing the advancements Bolivia has recently forged –Túpac Katari 1
(a telecommunications satellite), better road networks, and Mi Teleférico are a
few among a myriad of others. By any standard, this is development, modern and
innovative and telling of a society surely coming to join developed ranks.
I definitely think these things are good and congratulations to Bolivia; however, I couldn’t help but
think of conversations I have had over the six weeks I have been here, the conversations
about healthcare and public education and gender inequity and censorship of the
press –
And, in stark contrast to a telecommunications satellite,
these things do not seem to lend themselves to such a developed, as we
understand the term, country anymore.
Sure, Bolivia’s parliament is half-composed of women, but as
of 2007, only 24.6 percent of Bolivian women were formally employed, meaning
75.4 percent of Bolivian women lack access to social security and health
benefits (UN Women). And, sure, Bolivia is now formally named the Plurinational
State of Bolivia; however, extreme poverty still disproportionately affects
rural areas. In turn, the majority of persons living in extreme poverty are
indigenous groups (UNICEF).
Granted, the statistics used are getting old, and we do know there has been an expanse of the middle class under Morales' administration; however, as of now, I am unconvinced, however, I am hopeful – while Bolivia
has yet to use its robust economic growth to create solid social programs, it
has not lost its opportunity to. Yes, there are many challenges, like rapid
urbanization, and the general difficulty of social development, but there is
time. And for the sake of marginalized groups that the current government
claims to represent, it has got to happen.
Nice post that poses the questions we addressed in the meeting. But think about going in a bit of depth next time - this is a good overview, but try to take a perspective on what development means here - are there any theoretical commonalities between the projects?
ReplyDelete