On Thursday afternoon,
our group had the privilege of visiting the UNDP office (United Nations
Development Program) in La Paz. Growing up I remember being in awe of the UN. All
the national flags in front of the impressive building in downtown New York, the
huge auditorium filled with important people from all over the world, and the commercials
of Blue Berets soldiers lifting corn sacks out of truck beds to feed starving
children in Africa inspired respect and wonder. However, learning about the
specifics of this institution turned out to be a rather sobering experience.
Recurring sex
trafficking or extortion scandals and their resulting cover-ups, the little-publicized
cholera outbreak in Haiti caused by UN soldiers, as well as the systemic
failures during peacekeeping missions such as the one in Rwanda, are only some
examples that indicate the sweeping problems (such as lack of accountability)
plaguing this institution. While I understand the realpolitik
limitations of such a voluntary multi-national mega project, the reality of the
UN’s suffocating bureaucracy is still disappointing.
During our visit to the
UNDP, the presenter also spoke at length about the local UNHRC branch. Turns
out that ‘enforcement’
is a difficult and controversial term for the UN. The best they can hope to do
is try to encourage respect for human rights. Unsurprisingly, issuing recommendations
and statements is often not enough.
The continued presence of UNHRC branches
relies on sustaining the good will of the host nation. Logically, this results
in a skewed power dynamic that does not set the stage for efficient
“enforcement” or even reporting of human rights violations. For Bolivia
specifically that means that while citizens technically enjoy a wide range of
human rights, in practice, the government often fails to respect or enforce
these rights. One very prominent example of this is the police abuse of
peaceful indigenous protestors during the 2011 TIPNIS conflict.
The UNHRC response to such events is the
issuing of a yearly report, carefully worded and balancing criticism with
praise, begging for better national implementation of the Charter. With the
nationalization of the gas and oil industries filling the national coffers,
Bolivia has become less and less reliant on UN donor money. This has further
decreased all of the local UN branches social and political influence. The UN employee accurately described the
situation as the UNHRC having its “hands tied.”
Sadly, the UN resembles more closely a sad
and toothless tiger, rather than the superhero world police organization that I
had believed it to be as a child.
Nice post that effectively critiques the current set up of the UNHCR being dependent on local governments. But I wanted to hear more about your idea of the UN as being a toothless tiger that you introduce in the end - these are important realties to be analyzed.
ReplyDelete